If yesterday we talked about the message that Ana Rosa Quintana left on Twitter, referring to the cold and the lack of tapas and canes in Finland, today we have to do it from another well-known presenter, Nuria Roca, that He also "showed off" when talking on the Finnish education system.
His words were as follows:
I am very sorry but the parents who participate in toooodas school activities also give me a lot of laziness ... here and in Finland.
As is logical and as usually happens, if together in a sentence the word "parents" and a criticism, many people will be offended and what happened was that the criticism rained, some more respectful and others less, to which she treated to defend himself as he could. Leaving aside the topic of comments and focusing on his words, saying that in the same way that Ana Rosa's words can be annoying, those of Nuria Roca could also have saved them for herself.
Let's put them in context
If in a talk between two parents who talk about the involvement of other parents in school someone said that there are parents who participate in all the children's activities and that what laziness, I could understand that it refers to those parents who only a bed is missing at school and in that context I could even agree with the statement.
However, Nuria Roca's tweet referred to what we could see in Salvados, and what we could see there is a father with a paternal leave of six months taking care of his son, explaining that there the parents have to participate with the school, attending meetings, being able to go (optionally) to the classes of their children and taking courses to be able to help the children in the learning of the subjects, among other things. In fact, he said that those parents who are not awaiting the education of their children and who do not attend meetings with the school can be investigated by social services, in case there is an omission of care (here in Spain there should be more inspectors than bakers).
Of course, after watching that sequence of the program, one feels that that place is magnificent, because at work they give you permission to go to your children's school, because the paternal and maternal casualties are much more logical than in Spain and because there, after all, what they do is invest in the children so that later , in the future and in the long term, be educated, educated and valid adults, with similar opportunities.
Sloth?
Then, after seeing this and after envying it, Mrs. Roca appears and tells us that "What laziness". Well, no sloth, and less in a country where many parents take the children to school to park them from eight to five, without knowing or wanting to know what is being cooked in there. Laziness none in a country where children get bad and have to go to the "doped" school of ibuprofen because "as they see it bad they throw it away," like the one who takes the car to the ITV, and is that "no I have someone to leave it with. ” Lazy none in a country where teachers call parents because their children are sick and parents "can't go, I'm sorry, I'm working", because work is more important here than our children (to see in which agreement the hours appear that we can take to go to the school of the children).
But of course, as with Ana Rosa, I doubt that her children go to a public school, of those in which they already leave in inequality due to the mere fact of being enrolled. That is really lazy, see that your children will not be able to receive the best education because they go to a school that you do not like, with children whose parents are lazy and believe that children are educated in school and with increasingly burned teachers because politicians, whose children also do not go to a public school and that they must also feel lazy when they open the “Education” folder, they do nothing more than make policies that increase inequalities and that ultimately make their children have greater and better opportunities in the future than ours. That is lazy.
